While "surfing the web" I stumbled upon an article about cross dressers by Ellen Sherman and wanted to re-tell it. It's really long so I didn't. You can Google it. It's about the 11 Misconceptions of Cross Dressers.
Ellen opens by saying every Fall, several hundred traditional husbands, fathers and businessmen come together in Provincetown for Fantasia Fair with parties, seminars and workshops exploring the thorny issue of how to buy the right wig and hide a 5 o'clock shadow with the foundation and blush-on. Heterosexual married men from suburbia with families are among those who cross-dress. What's going on? Apparently cross dressing is a much more common practice than most people would imagine.
I thought it complimented the blog "Femulate" by Stana, Stana. The bottom-line, speaking for myself, is you can't change a cross dresser's mind, they are the way they are, period! Some know themselves to be honest to goodness women. I know I do!
This information was originally published on 5/28/98, and can be viewed at; http://www.selfhelpmagazine.com/articles/sex/xdress.html
It's lots of stuff you may already know and has many giant mental minds in it but despite that and its publication date, it hasn't changed anything in this civil and polite society for us. We're still seen as lowly trannies for the most part. Maybe that change will come soon, when 'soon' will be is any one's guess.
Just sayin'
Sunday, June 30, 2013
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Wearing a corset 24/7
I just read an article about a woman, an honest to goodness GG woman, who is 24 years old and has been wearing a corset for three years. She says her goal is to obtain the world's smallest waist. She has spent the last three years eating, sleeping and living in a corset, and her waist is a mere three inches smaller than when she started. Sad!
It's a foolish thing to do when coupled with the cited potential medical problems, and there are plenty. However, I see no reason to stop sleeping in my Squeem! It's a perplexing psychological phenomena, people who are so entrenched in their own self-perception, like I am in my desire to be a woman, I'm just a man who merely chooses to present as a woman and all that entails.
I'm not much different from the majority of men who wear a dress and makeup for other men and I do that in order to get fucked. So, does that make me gay? I think not but I may be wrong!
I do feel my movements and actions are more feminine when I wear a heavily boned cloth corset, not to mention the short skirts and high heels! And, when I check my reflection in my hall mirror every morning, I believe I also look just a bit sexy! All the male admirers I "date" would have me be naughty for them anyway and since that's what I see as my major female goal in my trans-life, it's a no-brainer!
I know my oral desire can easily be turned into a simple fixation but I don't have a pussy and it just happens to be my preference! I enjoy my sexual interactions with men and I like the taste of their semen. I simply love making love to a man including being fucked by him! I feel we should leave well enough alone.
Se la vie!
It's a foolish thing to do when coupled with the cited potential medical problems, and there are plenty. However, I see no reason to stop sleeping in my Squeem! It's a perplexing psychological phenomena, people who are so entrenched in their own self-perception, like I am in my desire to be a woman, I'm just a man who merely chooses to present as a woman and all that entails.
I'm not much different from the majority of men who wear a dress and makeup for other men and I do that in order to get fucked. So, does that make me gay? I think not but I may be wrong!
I do feel my movements and actions are more feminine when I wear a heavily boned cloth corset, not to mention the short skirts and high heels! And, when I check my reflection in my hall mirror every morning, I believe I also look just a bit sexy! All the male admirers I "date" would have me be naughty for them anyway and since that's what I see as my major female goal in my trans-life, it's a no-brainer!
I know my oral desire can easily be turned into a simple fixation but I don't have a pussy and it just happens to be my preference! I enjoy my sexual interactions with men and I like the taste of their semen. I simply love making love to a man including being fucked by him! I feel we should leave well enough alone.
Se la vie!
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
The Quick Reference to the Diagnostic Criteria From the DSM-4-TR
From one poster on Amazon: Finally, someone recognizes that there are non-professionals who need to use the DSM IV-TR. I am a family law attorney and have to deal with forensic psychological evaluations or psychological issues in my divorce cases, but I have no mental health training.
Honest and interesting.
From another: My father was a psychologist. Amateur diagnoses were the bane of his existence and professional misdiagnoses are just as dangerous. I can see why. I have been unable to recognize people I know from the vague descriptions in the literature. It's totally irresponsible to lead people to believe that any layman can simply pick up the DSM and make diagnoses and recommend a course of therapy!
Insane, yet it happens!
Yet another comment about this book was, In the meantime, making diagnoses from the DSM is not only a physician's role it's his right!"
This comment causes me to offer, with no offense intended, apparently not that much is known about American mental health. Again, no offense is intended, but clinicians who are not doctors but still learning students in colleges (lay-persons) are future psychologists, future social workers, future psychiatric nurse practitioners, etc., and all are taught to use the DSM for making diagnoses. They are taught they have a responsibility to do so, which they do, then take that teaching as a "legal" right to recommend therapies! This says a lot for inexperience and students of academia.
According to the ethics of the field, and in concert with my own opinions, to make mental health diagnoses, let alone prescribe or recommend therapies, according to the DSM and criteria contained within it, is a joke. IMO, no one should use it because its methods are not "written in stone" and, in my further opinion, this book can be quite harmful!
Point in case, I've been asked hundreds of times by men who are married to give them meaningless, albeit quickie, blow jobs while their wives are away, AND we should not talk about it, ever! So, does that mean I have a mental illness and they're merely taking advantage of it? Who is right and who is wrong?
I see myself as a person who loves to dress like a female, wear makeup, and love men in the one way I know best how! But because I'm a known femme and oftentimes comply with requests, I have to ask myself, should I continue? It's well known I'm a male to female transvestite and I thoroughly enjoy sucking men's cocks to climax, I also happen to be thought of as a sex-starved horny bitch by both these same men and their women! Bottom line, I don't think I'm behaving badly as a woman and neither do my admirers!
Without question YOU should be allowed to be the kind of woman YOU want to be!
Honest and interesting.
From another: My father was a psychologist. Amateur diagnoses were the bane of his existence and professional misdiagnoses are just as dangerous. I can see why. I have been unable to recognize people I know from the vague descriptions in the literature. It's totally irresponsible to lead people to believe that any layman can simply pick up the DSM and make diagnoses and recommend a course of therapy!
Insane, yet it happens!
Yet another comment about this book was, In the meantime, making diagnoses from the DSM is not only a physician's role it's his right!"
This comment causes me to offer, with no offense intended, apparently not that much is known about American mental health. Again, no offense is intended, but clinicians who are not doctors but still learning students in colleges (lay-persons) are future psychologists, future social workers, future psychiatric nurse practitioners, etc., and all are taught to use the DSM for making diagnoses. They are taught they have a responsibility to do so, which they do, then take that teaching as a "legal" right to recommend therapies! This says a lot for inexperience and students of academia.
According to the ethics of the field, and in concert with my own opinions, to make mental health diagnoses, let alone prescribe or recommend therapies, according to the DSM and criteria contained within it, is a joke. IMO, no one should use it because its methods are not "written in stone" and, in my further opinion, this book can be quite harmful!
Point in case, I've been asked hundreds of times by men who are married to give them meaningless, albeit quickie, blow jobs while their wives are away, AND we should not talk about it, ever! So, does that mean I have a mental illness and they're merely taking advantage of it? Who is right and who is wrong?
I see myself as a person who loves to dress like a female, wear makeup, and love men in the one way I know best how! But because I'm a known femme and oftentimes comply with requests, I have to ask myself, should I continue? It's well known I'm a male to female transvestite and I thoroughly enjoy sucking men's cocks to climax, I also happen to be thought of as a sex-starved horny bitch by both these same men and their women! Bottom line, I don't think I'm behaving badly as a woman and neither do my admirers!
Without question YOU should be allowed to be the kind of woman YOU want to be!
Friday, April 19, 2013
The Boston deal
I wish to convey my condolences to all those people who lost limbs and those who lost their lives and their survivors.
My fear is that this is going to become more common in future days. It is unfathomable.
While it may not help you, be assured those who died are in a better place. Again, my heartfelt sympathies.
My fear is that this is going to become more common in future days. It is unfathomable.
While it may not help you, be assured those who died are in a better place. Again, my heartfelt sympathies.
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Comments in response to a question got me thinking.
The question is/was, Is rape wrong? While I feel rape ought not be done to anyone, I know it happens all the time. I've even been a victim of it .. twice!
I have to ask, is it merely biology turned on? Is it done to relieve stress? Does it have anything to do with raging hormones? Does the use of drugs and alcohol enhance the act for either a male or a female? As you can see I have many questions!
As background and at the risk of TMI, I've sucked many men to climax while they've been doing lines of coke and drinking heavily, that didn't stop them from enjoying what I was doing! And I don't need either to do it, just their permission.
IMO, the level of personal maturity and pure curiosity, especially at a young age for both males and females, plays a large and significant role. Add drugs and alcohol into the mix and the outcome can be either disastrous or pleasant depending on you and your feelings. Politics has nothing to do with this and neither, IMO, does responsibility. I feel you can legislate and teach what you will, both right and wrong (especially to young people) and in the end curiosity and desire will win out every time! We are, after all, only human.
Sadly, the only way to stop our suffering is to change or bring an end to societal thoughts about us. Sadly also, is adults (seemingly responsible, usually educated) will do whatever they can to frame any act of any under aged person (seemingly immature) as simple innocence or folly and down-play or discount most outcomes as a result. Rape and shootings of course happen, probably more than we care to know, but these things can be either planned or sporadic. To be sure both have consequences and both have ripple effects. Cross dressing obviously is not exempt!
So, where does that place the cross dresser? I've been chastised and tossed out by my own family and raped and beaten, but thankfully not shot, just because I decided to wear a dress. While I can't answer that question, I know it's senseless! For the most part, people will use a system they created to prosecute those who they feel do not comply, that system was NOT created by the victims! Again, we are merely human (supposedly older and wiser) yet by no means do we have all the answers for every situation. We simply pick and choose according to our own feelings regarding all matters including cross dressing. This is especially true for cross sexed persons. Frustrating to say the least.
This following statement is from the UK Home Office where it is commonly believed, "Drugs destroy lives and cause untold misery to families and communities and this is why we believe they must remain illegal," They add, "Decriminalisation is not the answer." That sounds honest but Guatemala disagrees. Cross dressing is rarely addressed in either culture, so, are we really the problem then? I think not but society seems to disagree with me! What difference does it make if I choose to wear a dress and be naughty for men? The problems of the world do not rest upon me! Unequal amounts of positive lip-service is paid to all cross dressers but the problem of discrimination and hatred goes on, nothing truly changes.
International agreements AGAINST the illegal drug trade, especially in regard to addictive narcotics, date back to 1912 and are well documented. The United Nations estimates that there are 230 million drug users globally, and the annual trade in illegal drugs is worth an estimated $330bn US dollars. The lion's share of that expenditure is in Western countries by the way, not where the drugs are grown and processed! An interesting tid-bit.
According to a Central American prison director, Azalia Lopez, "Drug dealers and drug traffickers are not evil people. They are in it for the money." He also notes the drug dealers and drug traffickers can be reformed, but my question is, Do they need to be?
According to this society they do! But the same is thought about cross dressers!
The organization Save the Children says, increasing numbers of children in Syria are being recruited by armed groups on both sides of the conflict. Both sides! Children are being used as porters, guards, informers, fighters and, in some cases, human shields. All these children have seen the devastation of war first hand and it is claimed some two million children are in need of assistance in Syria alone. Not much is done about that. Guess there's no money in it.
Mahatma Gandi once said, "Be the change you want to see."
I say, Be the kind of woman YOU want to be!
I have to ask, is it merely biology turned on? Is it done to relieve stress? Does it have anything to do with raging hormones? Does the use of drugs and alcohol enhance the act for either a male or a female? As you can see I have many questions!
As background and at the risk of TMI, I've sucked many men to climax while they've been doing lines of coke and drinking heavily, that didn't stop them from enjoying what I was doing! And I don't need either to do it, just their permission.
IMO, the level of personal maturity and pure curiosity, especially at a young age for both males and females, plays a large and significant role. Add drugs and alcohol into the mix and the outcome can be either disastrous or pleasant depending on you and your feelings. Politics has nothing to do with this and neither, IMO, does responsibility. I feel you can legislate and teach what you will, both right and wrong (especially to young people) and in the end curiosity and desire will win out every time! We are, after all, only human.
Sadly, the only way to stop our suffering is to change or bring an end to societal thoughts about us. Sadly also, is adults (seemingly responsible, usually educated) will do whatever they can to frame any act of any under aged person (seemingly immature) as simple innocence or folly and down-play or discount most outcomes as a result. Rape and shootings of course happen, probably more than we care to know, but these things can be either planned or sporadic. To be sure both have consequences and both have ripple effects. Cross dressing obviously is not exempt!
So, where does that place the cross dresser? I've been chastised and tossed out by my own family and raped and beaten, but thankfully not shot, just because I decided to wear a dress. While I can't answer that question, I know it's senseless! For the most part, people will use a system they created to prosecute those who they feel do not comply, that system was NOT created by the victims! Again, we are merely human (supposedly older and wiser) yet by no means do we have all the answers for every situation. We simply pick and choose according to our own feelings regarding all matters including cross dressing. This is especially true for cross sexed persons. Frustrating to say the least.
This following statement is from the UK Home Office where it is commonly believed, "Drugs destroy lives and cause untold misery to families and communities and this is why we believe they must remain illegal," They add, "Decriminalisation is not the answer." That sounds honest but Guatemala disagrees. Cross dressing is rarely addressed in either culture, so, are we really the problem then? I think not but society seems to disagree with me! What difference does it make if I choose to wear a dress and be naughty for men? The problems of the world do not rest upon me! Unequal amounts of positive lip-service is paid to all cross dressers but the problem of discrimination and hatred goes on, nothing truly changes.
International agreements AGAINST the illegal drug trade, especially in regard to addictive narcotics, date back to 1912 and are well documented. The United Nations estimates that there are 230 million drug users globally, and the annual trade in illegal drugs is worth an estimated $330bn US dollars. The lion's share of that expenditure is in Western countries by the way, not where the drugs are grown and processed! An interesting tid-bit.
According to a Central American prison director, Azalia Lopez, "Drug dealers and drug traffickers are not evil people. They are in it for the money." He also notes the drug dealers and drug traffickers can be reformed, but my question is, Do they need to be?
According to this society they do! But the same is thought about cross dressers!
The organization Save the Children says, increasing numbers of children in Syria are being recruited by armed groups on both sides of the conflict. Both sides! Children are being used as porters, guards, informers, fighters and, in some cases, human shields. All these children have seen the devastation of war first hand and it is claimed some two million children are in need of assistance in Syria alone. Not much is done about that. Guess there's no money in it.
Mahatma Gandi once said, "Be the change you want to see."
I say, Be the kind of woman YOU want to be!
Sunday, March 3, 2013
Lech Walesa said ....
I just read this on-line and had to comment on it. Lech Walesa said, "A minority should not impose itself on the majority,". Sounds like good advice but ... IMO, neither ought a majority impose itself on a minority!
We cross dressers who are a clear minority in my mind, often get killed and hardly no-one is taken to task over that most dastardly and terminal crime. Many do not pay more than mere lip service to it, after all, it is fairly commonly known that we, especially male to female trannies (he-shes), were asking for it! Speaking for myself, I only dress this way behind closed doors!
You can read the full article here, http://news.yahoo.com/lech-walesa-shocks-poland-anti-gay-words-120940766.html
The posted replies were obviously in full support of his statement, which is kind of telling. There were few, if any, call outs for his bias and except from those in the article, society generally makes many in-roads to accept us as is while the "other" side of society has another image of us!
Given the hidden nature of this "polite and civil society" (which is quite secretive and very private) it's little wonder I turned out as I have. Growing up and being a closeted gay, (a queer to most) many males have told me to suck their cock or take a beating! Simple. These males didn't like me much but they expected nothing less from me and I simply accepted having low morals. What can I say, I guess I'm an honest tramp! And yes, I dress like a woman and I've sucked many cocks and swallowed or worn many male's semen on my made up face. For the most part, most guys seemed to enjoy it. For the record, so did, and still do, I.
Granted, sometimes I wanted fervently to do exactly that to a man, especially when I was younger and just learning about myself, but I had no clue it would lead me to what I am today. Most males (admires), to put it bluntly, only expect one thing from me and today I'm hopelessly addicted to it all! I willingly set myself up to look the part of a whore for them, I sometimes go out afterward, and I often allow men to command me to do it for them merely because I'm a male who thinks and feels female!
Oh yeah, I've been "trained" by males most of my young life but I'm not saying that being "trained" by men makes me guiltless. I can only imagine what the alternative might have been like! I'm not even all that sad, I only mention males training me because it just became another part of my reality and it enhanced me. I've taken my training fully voluntarily and told I took it very well!
Being a T-woman (for me) simply means playing a sexual role for a man, I do not see myself as a threat! I have serious doubts I will ever change and I know where semen comes from, I merely want it.
Be the kind of woman YOU want to be!
We cross dressers who are a clear minority in my mind, often get killed and hardly no-one is taken to task over that most dastardly and terminal crime. Many do not pay more than mere lip service to it, after all, it is fairly commonly known that we, especially male to female trannies (he-shes), were asking for it! Speaking for myself, I only dress this way behind closed doors!
You can read the full article here, http://news.yahoo.com/lech-walesa-shocks-poland-anti-gay-words-120940766.html
The posted replies were obviously in full support of his statement, which is kind of telling. There were few, if any, call outs for his bias and except from those in the article, society generally makes many in-roads to accept us as is while the "other" side of society has another image of us!
Given the hidden nature of this "polite and civil society" (which is quite secretive and very private) it's little wonder I turned out as I have. Growing up and being a closeted gay, (a queer to most) many males have told me to suck their cock or take a beating! Simple. These males didn't like me much but they expected nothing less from me and I simply accepted having low morals. What can I say, I guess I'm an honest tramp! And yes, I dress like a woman and I've sucked many cocks and swallowed or worn many male's semen on my made up face. For the most part, most guys seemed to enjoy it. For the record, so did, and still do, I.
Granted, sometimes I wanted fervently to do exactly that to a man, especially when I was younger and just learning about myself, but I had no clue it would lead me to what I am today. Most males (admires), to put it bluntly, only expect one thing from me and today I'm hopelessly addicted to it all! I willingly set myself up to look the part of a whore for them, I sometimes go out afterward, and I often allow men to command me to do it for them merely because I'm a male who thinks and feels female!
Oh yeah, I've been "trained" by males most of my young life but I'm not saying that being "trained" by men makes me guiltless. I can only imagine what the alternative might have been like! I'm not even all that sad, I only mention males training me because it just became another part of my reality and it enhanced me. I've taken my training fully voluntarily and told I took it very well!
Being a T-woman (for me) simply means playing a sexual role for a man, I do not see myself as a threat! I have serious doubts I will ever change and I know where semen comes from, I merely want it.
Be the kind of woman YOU want to be!
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
This just in .....
The NYC's mayor Bloomberg’s off-the-cuff comment on 1/27/2013, bewildered author writing profile on mayoral candidate Christine Quinn. Mayor Bloomberg also had a couple of pointed comments on Quinn’s appearance, he said, 'Get rid of the gray and strap on some heels.'
He actually said that to her!
You can read more here: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/s-inine-bloomberg-a-article-1.1249432#ixzz2JHv4AWeK
On Monday, Jan 28, 2013, MP Richard Graham said, 'Short skirts and high heels risk rape', well, that comment landed him in the dog house as well.
Amanda Perthen published a similar article in January and updated it on the 27th, but nothing was said to her about it! Sounds a lot like politics to me.
Richard Graham, MP for Gloucester, sparked outrage for saying that women put themselves at risk of rape by dressing provocatively. I would tend to agree with him and that's exactly why I do it, after all we're both genetic men. We know them!
His comments also sparked outrage among various pro-women’s groups. They insist that if a woman becomes a victim of a rape it is not because of her dress style. I'm not sure I agree with them as it's also about where the girl is, what kind of environment she's in, who is going to be looking at her, and what they expect from her. She has choices, as do I, and of course these comments only serve as validation for me!
Mr Graham, who in the past likened a night out in his constituency city of Gloucester, England, to "decadent Rome", said, 'A night out is about having fun without putting yourself at risk. If you are a young woman on her own trying to walk back home through a park early in the morning in a tight, short skirt and high shoes, and there’s a predator ... or if you're blind drunk wearing those clothes, how able are you to get away?'
A very good point but I'd like to offer my thoughts to Mr Graham; I suspect not all females want to get away. Some just want to have no direct responsibility for what happens, yet they still want it to happen! As a T-girl, I know I do, but I must be very careful in order to survive. That is what I call compromise and it means next to nothing in this society which interprets what it does to trannys as justifiable.
Mr Graham’s comments came just days after actress Joanna Lumley (a GG) said women should dress demurely to avoid being 'raped or robbed'. Speaking at a Marks and Spencer campaign launch just last week, Ms Lumley said, 'Don’t look like trash, don’t get drunk, don’t be sick down your front, don’t break your heels and stagger about in the wrong clothes at midnight. This is bad.' Again, absolutely nothing was said about her comments!
Just as information, I don't get drunk out of my mind unless I'm at home! I don't usually lie sick in the gutter and when it's down my front I'm usually not alone! I also don't stagger about in the wrong clothes at midnight. Without 100% certainty I can say I know pretty much what I'm doing.
Fury ensued again as Ab-Fab's Patsy (UK) warned that girls they are putting THEMSELVES at risk of rape. And again, nothing was said or made of her comment, but she is a GG.
The corruption of a generation of our teachers has been linked to our daughters facing sexualisation as early as primary school, and the parents similar to Jon Bonet's parents don't cloud that thinking. Madison Avenue also plays a part. It is a little known fact that taking drugs or drinking heavily can affect a MAN's performance in the bedroom for years. A study was done to establish this last "fact" and my question firstly is, who cares, and secondly, why was it done?
I believe I'm seeing a pattern here. Do you?
Allow me to paraphrase Mr Graham, he said, I promise it is far better to look after yourself properly, i.e., don’t be sick in the gutter at midnight in a silly short dress with no money to get a taxi home because somebody might take advantage of you. If they don't rape you, they’ll probably knock you on the head and rob you.' And as we trannies know all too well, they may even kill you!
But the MP’s comments also provoked anger from charities. Anger among pro-women's groups, who insist that if a woman becomes a victim of rape it is not because of her dress style. A spokeswoman for the Gloucestershire Rape Crisis Centre said rape was the crime, not drunkenness, and that the offense was ‘stimulated by desire for power and to humiliate and degrade’. Wow! That sounds pretty good, I know I would willingly accept it!
While I agree about ".. whether you are drunk.', I heartily disagree with the idea 'It’s got nothing to do with how you are dressed,' I dress the way I do BECAUSE of the fact men take notice! Jo Wood, a trustee of Rape Crisis of England and Wales, said, 'These comments have set us back about 100 years. It doesn’t matter if you are off your face and lying naked on a bench, the man simply takes it upon himself to rape you. We should be about putting the blame back on the perpetrators.’
Vivienne Hayes, of the Women’s Resource Centre, added, 'Such comments frighteningly normal-ise victim-blaming. They reallocate blame from the perpetrator to the victim. The problem is not female vulnerability but a macho culture which produces the notion of male entitlement. We have fostered a culture which consistently fails women through disbelief, victim-blaming, and failure to investigate.'
That is more obvious with regard to T-girls in the US. The incidence of rape is simply down played because you're a man wearing a dress. After being looked over by a policeman, I've been told I was probably asking for it!
Chief Inspector Richard Burge, of Gloucestershire Police, agreed being drunk could put people at risk. He said, 'We would appeal to everyone not to drink so much that you don’t know what’s happening. Excessive alcohol can make you vulnerable, so, stay with friends and if you are with a friend, try to look out for them too.'
I agree with the Chief Inspector, it fits pretty well for trannys as well.
On a related note, a Liberal party Democrat (male) MP, who sparked outrage for saying ‘the Jews had not learned from the murder of six million in the Holocaust' apologized just last night. Bradford MP David Ward said he was sorry for any 'unintended offense' in his comments. No protest has been noted by any women's groups, nor any Jewish ones!
It isn't a shit storm, it's the truth. A woman should be free to dress as she wishes and our courts should sentence rapist scum-bags, not let them off because the girl was really a boy. How far out of touch are these judges anyway?
I dress like a tramp and behave badly, I show my panties to every man every time I sit, but I do not ASK to be raped! Maybe I do, I don't think so.
Let me pose these questions; If I have nice things in my house and leave them unattended when I go out, do I "deserve" to be burgled? If I have a nice car am I asking for it to be broken into and robbed? It's pretty well known if I have money hanging out of my back pocket, I'm going to attract thieves. Similarly, the same can be said for wearing short skirts and highheels except the kind of person you'll attract simply wants to fuck you. If you want to be a woman but don't want to be fucked, don't wear short skirts and highheels! Simple.
I, for one, think what I wear tells every man about me, with just one simple look he can tell that I'm a whore. But he might not know if I'm a man or a woman and to learn that he must approach me and speak with me, then he'll know! I know rape shouldn't happen but the stats point to the fact it does. The above info is right and, in more ways than one all Mr Graham did was state the obvious. For that he paid!
What I've noticed is that most young woman (GGs) give the appearance of having little self respect and they dress in a very provocative manner. I merely do the same things as them! I'm sure being pretty and having a lovely personality, not to mention a real vag, there is absolutely no need to "let it all hang out" unless of course they wish to attract someone for sex. They are my real competition for cock.
Keep in mind what this civil society is all about. I'm a T-woman and while I think all those people above have valid points, they are saying to women, 'Don't get yourself in silly situations.' That in itself is not sexist, it's merely sensible, and it's good advice for any T-woman as well!
Let me close by saying this, here are a few facts as I've seen them. We have young ladies in a male dominated society out on the town dressed in as little as possible, sexily exposed and in all probability, hoping a man is looking. This young woman gets smashed out of her head and lets this guy take her. Which brings me to the artificially hormone filled males, which I won't even go into except to ask how many hours do you need a hard-on to last? Very horny men looking at what they see as a smorgasbord of female temptation and while she may or may not complain, rape happens.
I love all women and think the female form is to be admired. Being gay and choosing to be a mtf trans I think I'm merely copying real women.
He actually said that to her!
You can read more here: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/s-inine-bloomberg-a-article-1.1249432#ixzz2JHv4AWeK
On Monday, Jan 28, 2013, MP Richard Graham said, 'Short skirts and high heels risk rape', well, that comment landed him in the dog house as well.
Amanda Perthen published a similar article in January and updated it on the 27th, but nothing was said to her about it! Sounds a lot like politics to me.
Richard Graham, MP for Gloucester, sparked outrage for saying that women put themselves at risk of rape by dressing provocatively. I would tend to agree with him and that's exactly why I do it, after all we're both genetic men. We know them!
His comments also sparked outrage among various pro-women’s groups. They insist that if a woman becomes a victim of a rape it is not because of her dress style. I'm not sure I agree with them as it's also about where the girl is, what kind of environment she's in, who is going to be looking at her, and what they expect from her. She has choices, as do I, and of course these comments only serve as validation for me!
Mr Graham, who in the past likened a night out in his constituency city of Gloucester, England, to "decadent Rome", said, 'A night out is about having fun without putting yourself at risk. If you are a young woman on her own trying to walk back home through a park early in the morning in a tight, short skirt and high shoes, and there’s a predator ... or if you're blind drunk wearing those clothes, how able are you to get away?'
A very good point but I'd like to offer my thoughts to Mr Graham; I suspect not all females want to get away. Some just want to have no direct responsibility for what happens, yet they still want it to happen! As a T-girl, I know I do, but I must be very careful in order to survive. That is what I call compromise and it means next to nothing in this society which interprets what it does to trannys as justifiable.
Mr Graham’s comments came just days after actress Joanna Lumley (a GG) said women should dress demurely to avoid being 'raped or robbed'. Speaking at a Marks and Spencer campaign launch just last week, Ms Lumley said, 'Don’t look like trash, don’t get drunk, don’t be sick down your front, don’t break your heels and stagger about in the wrong clothes at midnight. This is bad.' Again, absolutely nothing was said about her comments!
Just as information, I don't get drunk out of my mind unless I'm at home! I don't usually lie sick in the gutter and when it's down my front I'm usually not alone! I also don't stagger about in the wrong clothes at midnight. Without 100% certainty I can say I know pretty much what I'm doing.
Fury ensued again as Ab-Fab's Patsy (UK) warned that girls they are putting THEMSELVES at risk of rape. And again, nothing was said or made of her comment, but she is a GG.
The corruption of a generation of our teachers has been linked to our daughters facing sexualisation as early as primary school, and the parents similar to Jon Bonet's parents don't cloud that thinking. Madison Avenue also plays a part. It is a little known fact that taking drugs or drinking heavily can affect a MAN's performance in the bedroom for years. A study was done to establish this last "fact" and my question firstly is, who cares, and secondly, why was it done?
I believe I'm seeing a pattern here. Do you?
Allow me to paraphrase Mr Graham, he said, I promise it is far better to look after yourself properly, i.e., don’t be sick in the gutter at midnight in a silly short dress with no money to get a taxi home because somebody might take advantage of you. If they don't rape you, they’ll probably knock you on the head and rob you.' And as we trannies know all too well, they may even kill you!
But the MP’s comments also provoked anger from charities. Anger among pro-women's groups, who insist that if a woman becomes a victim of rape it is not because of her dress style. A spokeswoman for the Gloucestershire Rape Crisis Centre said rape was the crime, not drunkenness, and that the offense was ‘stimulated by desire for power and to humiliate and degrade’. Wow! That sounds pretty good, I know I would willingly accept it!
While I agree about ".. whether you are drunk.', I heartily disagree with the idea 'It’s got nothing to do with how you are dressed,' I dress the way I do BECAUSE of the fact men take notice! Jo Wood, a trustee of Rape Crisis of England and Wales, said, 'These comments have set us back about 100 years. It doesn’t matter if you are off your face and lying naked on a bench, the man simply takes it upon himself to rape you. We should be about putting the blame back on the perpetrators.’
Vivienne Hayes, of the Women’s Resource Centre, added, 'Such comments frighteningly normal-ise victim-blaming. They reallocate blame from the perpetrator to the victim. The problem is not female vulnerability but a macho culture which produces the notion of male entitlement. We have fostered a culture which consistently fails women through disbelief, victim-blaming, and failure to investigate.'
That is more obvious with regard to T-girls in the US. The incidence of rape is simply down played because you're a man wearing a dress. After being looked over by a policeman, I've been told I was probably asking for it!
Chief Inspector Richard Burge, of Gloucestershire Police, agreed being drunk could put people at risk. He said, 'We would appeal to everyone not to drink so much that you don’t know what’s happening. Excessive alcohol can make you vulnerable, so, stay with friends and if you are with a friend, try to look out for them too.'
I agree with the Chief Inspector, it fits pretty well for trannys as well.
On a related note, a Liberal party Democrat (male) MP, who sparked outrage for saying ‘the Jews had not learned from the murder of six million in the Holocaust' apologized just last night. Bradford MP David Ward said he was sorry for any 'unintended offense' in his comments. No protest has been noted by any women's groups, nor any Jewish ones!
It isn't a shit storm, it's the truth. A woman should be free to dress as she wishes and our courts should sentence rapist scum-bags, not let them off because the girl was really a boy. How far out of touch are these judges anyway?
I dress like a tramp and behave badly, I show my panties to every man every time I sit, but I do not ASK to be raped! Maybe I do, I don't think so.
Let me pose these questions; If I have nice things in my house and leave them unattended when I go out, do I "deserve" to be burgled? If I have a nice car am I asking for it to be broken into and robbed? It's pretty well known if I have money hanging out of my back pocket, I'm going to attract thieves. Similarly, the same can be said for wearing short skirts and highheels except the kind of person you'll attract simply wants to fuck you. If you want to be a woman but don't want to be fucked, don't wear short skirts and highheels! Simple.
I, for one, think what I wear tells every man about me, with just one simple look he can tell that I'm a whore. But he might not know if I'm a man or a woman and to learn that he must approach me and speak with me, then he'll know! I know rape shouldn't happen but the stats point to the fact it does. The above info is right and, in more ways than one all Mr Graham did was state the obvious. For that he paid!
What I've noticed is that most young woman (GGs) give the appearance of having little self respect and they dress in a very provocative manner. I merely do the same things as them! I'm sure being pretty and having a lovely personality, not to mention a real vag, there is absolutely no need to "let it all hang out" unless of course they wish to attract someone for sex. They are my real competition for cock.
Keep in mind what this civil society is all about. I'm a T-woman and while I think all those people above have valid points, they are saying to women, 'Don't get yourself in silly situations.' That in itself is not sexist, it's merely sensible, and it's good advice for any T-woman as well!
Let me close by saying this, here are a few facts as I've seen them. We have young ladies in a male dominated society out on the town dressed in as little as possible, sexily exposed and in all probability, hoping a man is looking. This young woman gets smashed out of her head and lets this guy take her. Which brings me to the artificially hormone filled males, which I won't even go into except to ask how many hours do you need a hard-on to last? Very horny men looking at what they see as a smorgasbord of female temptation and while she may or may not complain, rape happens.
I love all women and think the female form is to be admired. Being gay and choosing to be a mtf trans I think I'm merely copying real women.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)